Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 811 P.2d 421 - Fulton v. King Soopers

Fulton v. King Soopers’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
January 1992
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Boice v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. Is a worker who is delayed in his advancement in labor union status because of an industrial injury extended the usual wage adjustments as contemplated in section 8-42-110(3), 3B C.R.S. (1990 Supp.)? 2. Is a worker who suffers a permanent injury which results in his not being able to perform a substantial number of his pre-injury duties at work permanently unable to perform the duties offered by his employer as contemplated in section 8-42-110(3), 3B C.R.S. (1990 Supp.)?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he ALJ's finding that the claimant is performing his preinjury job without complaints from his supervisors is supported by substantial evidence, and is therefore binding on review.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “that a delay in [a] wage increase because of a union agreement does not operate to defeat the application of § 8-42-110(3).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.