Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 811 SE2D 299 - Eller v. State

Eller v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Mallory v. State · Romer v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In criminal proceedings, expert witnesses 'testifying with respect to the mental state or condition of an accused' cannot 'state an opinion or inference as to whether the accused did or did not have the mental state or condition constituting an element of the crime charged or of a defense thereto' because '[s]uch ultimate issues are matters for the trier of fact alone.' OCGA § 24-7-704.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[w]hether the accused committed an intentional act to harm the victim is a different question than whether someone likely committed an intentional act to harm the victim.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “If an appellant fails to meet his or her burden of proving either prong of the Strickland test, the reviewing court does not have to examine the other prong.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.