Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 811 SO2D 770 - Ingraham v. State

Ingraham v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Leon · Boyd v. United States · Marron v. United States · 803 So. 2d 598 - Connor v. State · Carlton v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We agree ... that the trial court erred in denying the motion to suppress because the search warrant failed to describe the items to be seized with particularity. In -fact, the warrant very nearly authorized a general search of [appellant’s] apartment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[W]hen consent is obtained after illegal police activity . . . the unlawful police action presumptively taints and renders involuntary any consent to search.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.