State v. Van Natta

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided July 3, 1991

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1991-07-03

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 1994

3 state decisions

Relies on Sheffield v. State · State v. Van Natta

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1991-07-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1OPINION

PER CURIAM.

¶2Appellee was arrested and charged with the offense of driving while intoxicated. After a pretrial hearing, the trial court granted appellee’s motion to suppress. The Court of Appeals affirmed. State v. Van Natta, 805 S.W.2d 40 (Tex.App. — Fort Worth, 1991).

¶3The State raises five grounds for review. As is true in every case where discretion*609ary review is refused, this refusal does not constitute endorsement or adoption of the reasoning employed by the Court of Appeals. Sheffield v. State, 650 S.W.2d 813 (Tex.Cr.App.1983). With this understanding, we refuse the State’s petition for discretionary review.

McCORMICK, P.J., and BAIRD, J., would grant.