Streetman v. Lynaugh’s Empirical Analysis
812 F.2d 950 · 1987
Citation profile
25 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 51 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2017 · most notably Osborn v. Shillinger (1988), Amos v. Scott (1995)
25 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Johnson v. Zerbst · Townsend v. Sain · Fay v. Noia · United States v. Cronic
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“No “full and fair” evidentiary hearing has occurred if “the material facts were not adequately developed at the [S]tate court hearing.” ... Material facts are those facts crucial to a fair, rounded consideration of a petitioner’s claim____ Material facts have not been “adequately developed” where the petitioner alleges undeveloped evidence sufficient to call into question the “reliability” of the [S]tate court’s determination of [Petitioner's federal claims.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]t is well established that counsel's failure to marshall crucial evidence underlying a federal claim because of insufficient preparation or other neglect does not constitute a deliberate bypass.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“attractive that [it renders] a resulting confession involuntary.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.