Milton v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis
812 F.3d 1252 · 2016
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2242 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Slack v. McDaniel · William O'sullivan v. Darren Boerckel · George Smith Warden v. Lee Robbins · Michael Wayne Williams v. John Taylor Warden
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“would have to amend his habeas petition to add his new claims”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Waters v. Lockett“ha[d] a dramatically different factual predicate”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“file a second or successive habeas application.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Waters v. Lockett
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.