Bauer v. Lynch’s Empirical Analysis
812 F.3d 340 · 2016
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 4342 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 503 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Griggs v. Duke Power Co. · Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins · Ricci v. DeStefano · City of Los Angeles Department of Water v. Manhart · United States v. Virginia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]n employer does not contravene Title VII when it utilizes physical fitness standards that distinguish between the sexes on the basis of their physiological differences but impose an equal burden of compliance on both men and women, requiring the same level of physical fitness of each.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bauer v. Sessions“the few decisions to confront the use of gender-normed physical fitness standards in the Title VII context, none has deemed such standards to be unlawful,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and that the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.