United States v. Eghobor’s Empirical Analysis
812 F.3d 352 · 2015
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1035 (§ 244 of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 1347 (§ 242 of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 1349 (§ 902 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 2
Relies on United States v. Olano · Puckett v. United States · Allen v. United States · Henderson v. United States · United States v. Bermea
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“view all evidence, whether circumstantial or direct, in the light most favorable to the government, with all reasonable inferences and credibility choices to be made in support of the jury's verdict.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“‘The evidence need not exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence or be wholly inconsistent with every conclusion except, that of guilt,’ in order to be sufficient.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.