Krueger v. Torres’s Empirical Analysis
812 F.3d 365 · 2016
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1112 · 11 U.S.C. § 1307 · 11 U.S.C. § 523 · 11 U.S.C. § 707 · 11 U.S.C. § 727 · 28 U.S.C. § 158
Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Grogan v. Garner · Chambers v. Nasco, Inc. · Local Loan Co. v. Hunt · State v. Simpson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Due process requires notice 'reasonably calculated, under all the circumstances, to apprise interested parties of the pendency of the action and afford them an opportunity to present their objections.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.