Barbosa v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis
812 F.3d 62 · 2016
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Kotteakos v. United States · Coleman v. Thompson · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Pointer v. Texas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“admitting an opinion such as that offered by [a surrogate DNA analyst] violates the right to confrontation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Mattei v. Medeiros
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.