Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 812 F.3d 686 - Ash v. Colvin

Ash v. Colvin’s Empirical Analysis

812 F.3d 686 · 2016

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
July 2019
most recently cited

7 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636

Relies on Bowen v. Yuckert · McKinney v. Apfel · Talavera v. Astrue · Cox v. Astrue · Maresh v. Barnhart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Substantial evidence is less than a preponderance, but is enough that a reasonable mind would find it adequate to support the Commissioner's conclusion.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “if the Commissioner's decision is supported by ... substantial evidence on the record as a whole.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “12.05 Mental Retardation: Mental retardation refers to significantly subaverage general intellectual functioning with deficits in adaptive functioning initially manifested during the developmental period; i.e., the evidence demonstrates or supports onset of the impairment before age 22. The required level of severity for this disorder is met when the requirements in A, B, C, or D are satisfied. C. A valid verbal, performance, or full scale IQ of 60 through 70 and a physical or other mental impairment imposing an additional and significant work-related limitation of function;”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.