Ash v. Colvin’s Empirical Analysis
812 F.3d 686 · 2016
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
July 2019
most recently cited
7 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on Bowen v. Yuckert · McKinney v. Apfel · Talavera v. Astrue · Cox v. Astrue · Maresh v. Barnhart
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Substantial evidence is less than a preponderance, but is enough that a reasonable mind would find it adequate to support the Commissioner's conclusion.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“if the Commissioner's decision is supported by ... substantial evidence on the record as a whole.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“12.05 Mental Retardation: Mental retardation refers to significantly subaverage general intellectual functioning with deficits in adaptive functioning initially manifested during the developmental period; i.e., the evidence demonstrates or supports onset of the impairment before age 22. The required level of severity for this disorder is met when the requirements in A, B, C, or D are satisfied. C. A valid verbal, performance, or full scale IQ of 60 through 70 and a physical or other mental impairment imposing an additional and significant work-related limitation of function;”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Vance v. Berryhill
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.