Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 812 F. Supp. 819 - Braden Shielding Systems v. Shielding Dynamics

812 F. Supp. 819 - Braden Shielding Systems v. Shielding Dynamics’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
September 2017
most recently cited

1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently September 2017

1 district ·

20199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 109 · 28 U.S.C. § 113 · 28 U.S.C. § 1391 · 28 U.S.C. § 1400

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · International Shoe Co. v. Washington · World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson · Hanson v. Denckla · Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The amendments to § 1391 required the court in VE Holding to decide whether Congress sought to change the established substance of § 1400(b) by requiring the specific patent venue provision to be read in conjunction with the general venue prorision. The court emphasized two things: (1) the statutory language added in 1988 to § 1391(c), “[f]or purposes of venue under this chapter,” referred clearly to §§ 1391-1412 (and, necessarily, § 1400(b)), and thus amounted to the “exact and classic language of incorporation” that was missing in the 1948 version of § 1391(c) construed in Fourco; and (2) the drafters of the amendment were well aware of the issue of incorporation and so the obvious meaning of the words they chose should be respected. [VE Holding ] at 1579, 1582.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “shall be deemed to reside in any judicial district in which it is subject to personal jurisdiction at the time the action is commenced,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.