Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 812 P2D 147 - Keene v. State

Keene v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently January 2018

16 state decisions

90199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Voss v. Ralston · Frias v. State · Thomson v. Wyoming In-Stream Flow Committee · Basin Electric Power Cooperative v. State Board of Control

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) A person is guilty of kidnapping if he unlawfully removes another from his place of residence or business or from the vicinity where he was at the time of the removal, or if he unlawfully confines another person, with the intent to: (ii) Facilitate commission of a felony.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(a) A person is an habitual criminal if: (i) He is convicted of a violent felony; and (ii) He has been convicted of a felony on two (2) or more previous charges separately brought and tried which arose out of separate occurrences in this state or elsewhere.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “The witnesses rejected the first four photo line-ups, but picked out Keene in the fifth one_ Misty Tucker and Ken Urquhart recognized photo # 5 (Keene) as the robber. Lana Hendricks and Sharon Urquhart identified either photo # 1 (because of the hair) or # 5 (Keene) as the robber, and Hendricks believed she could identify the robber in person.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.