Johnson v. Hauck.’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Santosky v. Kramer · Lassiter v. Department of Social Services of Durham County North Carolina · Turner v. Rogers · Turner v. Rogers · Sanchez v. Walker County Department of Family & Children Services
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“)... [H]owever, that same statutory protection was not extended to an indigent parent in adoption proceedings conducted pursuant to OCGA § 19-8-10, despite the fact that those proceedings may ultimately end in the termination of his or her parental rights. See OCGA § 19-8-1 et seq. (Citations omitted.) Johnson , 344 Ga. App. at 854 (2), 812 S.E.2d 303 . 5 As this Court further resolved in Johnson ,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he propriety of that legislative decision is not for this Court to decide. See generally Commonwealth Investment Co. v. Frye , 219 Ga. 498 , 499, 134 S.E.2d 39 (1963) ('[T]he legislature, and not the courts, is empowered by the Constitution to decide public policy, and to implement that policy by enacting laws.').”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A child and any other party to a proceeding under this article shall have the right to an attorney at all stages of the proceedings under this article.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.