Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 812 SE2D 6 - SERDULA v. the STATE.

SERDULA v. the STATE.’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Rothenberg v. Security Management Co. · Stinski v. State · Williams v. State · State v. Nejad · Mayor of Savannah v. Batson-Cook Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “give[n] this [c]ourt no indication of what might have been raised in [the objections or] motion[s]. In essence, he leaves this [c]ourt to engage in a guessing game as to how [trial] counsel's representation, or rather lack thereof, might have amounted to ineffective assistance. Under these circumstances, [Rowland] has failed to show even a possibility of ineffective assistance, and there is no need for a hearing on remand.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.