812 So. 2d 1045 - Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
September 2004
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Barker v. Wingo · McClain v. State · 454 So. 2d 468 - Stringer v. State · 574 So. 2d 685 - McQuarter v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The supreme court has held that prejudice is assessed in the speedy trial context (1) to protect against oppressive pretrial incarceration, (2) for the minimization of anxiety and concern of the accused, and (3) for the limitation of the possibility of impairment of the defense.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Although it is the State's duty to insure that the defendant receives a speedy trial, a defendant has some responsibility to assert this right.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.