Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 812 SO2D 1081 - Donerson v. State

Donerson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
May 2014
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Batson v. Kentucky · 660 So. 2d 1228 - Davis v. State · 567 So. 2d 237 - Johnston v. State · 660 So. 2d 961 - Hiter v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “For this Court to rule on this issue, evidence of the racial makeup of the jury itself and evidence of the racial identity of each stricken juror would have to be presented into the record. This Court is only allowed to base its decisions upon evidence found within the record, not on assertions made by the parties in their briefs. Mason v. State, 440 So.2d 318, 319 (Miss.1983). No such evidence was present within the record of this case, and for this reason, this Court cannot rule on whether the prosecution misused its challenges in such a way that [the appellant's] counsel should have objected. Therefore, this basis cannot support an ineffective assistance of counsel claim.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A judge may make a determination of probable cause on any evidence offered to it, regardless of whether that evidence is admissible in court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.