George v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
May 2018
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on McClain v. State · 503 So. 2d 803 - Wetz v. State · 567 So. 2d 237 - Johnston v. State · 606 So. 2d 1132 - Parker v. State · 604 So. 2d 271 - Wells v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In deciding whether the prosecution has presented sufficient evidence to sustain the verdict, the Court should accept as true all credible evidence consistent with the defendant’s guilt and the State must be given the benefit of all favorable in ferences that may be reasonably drawn from the evidence. A reviewing court should only reverse where, with respect to one or more of the elements of the offense charged, the evidence is such that reasonable and fair-minded jurors could only find the accused not guilty.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Gates v. State · Johnson v. State“prejudiced by the jury selected or that the jury was biased or less than impartial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.