Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 812 SO2D 524 - Eggleston v. State

Eggleston v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 2015
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Faretta v. California · 698 So. 2d 248 - State v. Bowen · 688 So. 2d 901 - Hill v. State · 724 So. 2d 632 - Barnlund v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a criminal defendant who is competent to choose self-representation may not be denied that choice, even though the decision for self-representation will most certainly result in incompetent trial counsel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.