Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

812 So. 2d 594

Sinclair v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2002-04-04

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 2003

1 state decisions

Relies on 776 So. 2d 317 - Boyd v. State · 792 So. 2d 1207 - Williams v. State · 590 So. 2d 1032 - King v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-04-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

BARFIELD, J.

¶1The convictions are AFFIRMED. The sentences are REVERSED and the case is REMANDED to the trial court for resen-tencing. On remand, the trial court may again sentence appellant as a prison re-leasee reoffender if it makes the required findings and the evidence supports those findings. See Boyd v. State, 776 So.2d 317*595(Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 792 So.2d 1213 (Fla.2001); Randall v. State, 613 So.2d 93 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); King v. State, 590 So.2d 1032 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

ERVIN, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.
/812/so2d/594 · .json · Public domain