Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

812 So. 2d 624

Richmond v. Brown

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 15, 2002

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 2002-03-15

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 2003

1 state decisions

Relies on 694 So. 2d 1229 - Solomon v. MEDICAL CENTER OF LOUISIANA

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-03-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1In re Brown, Douglas C., M.D.; — Defendant; Applying for Supervisory and/or Re*625medial Writs, Parish of Ouachita, 4th Judicial District Court Div. F, No. M061-2001; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 35841-CW.

¶2PER CURIAM.

¶3These separate writ applications involve the common question of whether a defendant in a case pending in the medical review panel may compel the plaintiff to respond to interrogatories requesting information on the standard of care allegedly breached by the defendant. After reviewing the applications, we find further consideration of these cases are warranted in the court of appeal.

¶4Accordingly, the writ applications are remanded to the court of appeal for its consideration. Upon remand, the court of appeal should render an opinion, after appropriate briefing and argument from the parties, which definitively sets forth the position of the circuit on this issue. The court should also address the case of Solomon v. Medical Ctr., 97-0783 (La.App. 4 Cir. 5/14/97), 694 So.2d 1229, in its opinion.

KIMBALL, J., would deny the writ.KNOLL, J., would deny the writ.
/812/so2d/624 · .json · Public domain