Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 812 SW2D 152 - Shields v. Commonwealth

Shields v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
January 2004
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Grooms v. Commonwealth · Carter v. Commonwealth · Boone v. Commonwealth · Sizemore v. Commonwealth · Iles v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n order to be qualified to sit as a juror in a criminal case, a member of the venire must be able to consider any permissible punishment.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A meaningful voir dire examination by both sides is a sine qua non to the seating of a fair and impartial jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.