State v. Green’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
31 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently February 2014 · most notably State v. Hibler (2000), State v. Tisius (2012)
31 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Energy Cooperative, Inc. v. Phillips Petroleum Co. · Oneida Motor Freight, Inc. v. United Jersey · Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp. · Newland v. Georgia · Clozza v. Bair
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““1. A defendant may be convicted of an offense included in an offense charged in the indictment or information. An offense is so included when (1) It is established by proof of the same or less than all the facts required to establish the commission of the offense charged; or [[Image here]] 2. The court shall not be obligated to charge the jury with respect to an included offense unless there is a basis for a verdict acquitting the defendant of the offense charged and convicting him of the included offense.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Blewett · State v. Hinsa““[The accused’s] alleged ‘basis’ for submitting a jury instruction on the lesser included offense of trespass in the first degree is no more than ‘mere possibility and speculation.’ ... [T]here is insufficient evidence to support [the accused’s] contention that he entered the home for any reason other than to commit a crime.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hinsa
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.