National Labor Relations Board v. Hydro Conduit Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
813 F.2d 1002 · 1987
Citation profile
9 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act)
Relies on Vandygriff v. Phillips · Hannahville Indian Community v. United States · United States v. McConney · Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Weintraub · Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Massachusetts
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Section 102.67(f): Failure to request review [of a Regional Director’s consent to an election stipulation] shall preclude such parties from relitigating, in any related subsequent unfair labor practice proceeding, any issue which was, or could have been, raised in the representation proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“By failing to request [review of the Regional Directors' representation decision], the Union is barred from relitigating any such issue, especially the § 8(a)(5) charges.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.