Jovanovich v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
813 F.2d 1035 · 1987
Citation profile
66 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 94 later decisions — most recently September 2015 · most notably Parks School of Business, Inc. v. Symington (1995), Fox v. Citicorp Credit Services, Inc. (1994)
66 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act)
Relies on Bolker v. Commissioner · 21 Wis. 2d 182 - Pierringer v. Hoger · Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Corporation v. Laverl Johnson and Joleen Johnson, Husband and Wife, and Pacific Fruit Express Company, a Corporation · United States v. Standard Oil Co. of California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 94 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) when review is necessary to prevent a miscarriage of justice or to preserve the integrity of the judicial process, (2) when a change in law raises a new issue while an appeal is pending, and (3) when the issue is purely one of law.”
17 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“should make [ ] known to the court the action which the party desires the court to take or the party's objection to the action of the court and the grounds therefor ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.