Antonio B. Sampang v. R. Michael Marsh Frederick J. Allen

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Jan. 28, 1987. Decided March 4, 1987.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1987-03-04

Relies on Roxalana Hills Ltd. v. Masonite Corp.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1987-03-04

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently May 2007

1 district · 2 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Before SPROUSE, ERVIN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Antonio B. Sampang, appellant pro se.

Francis Walter Pedrotty, Office of the Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from that court's order refusing relief on plaintiff's claim that he was terminated from his employment in violation of his federal rights is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Sampang v. Marsh, C/A No. 85-375-R (W.D.Va., Apr. 30, 1986).

¶2

AFFIRMED.