Turpin v. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis
813 F.2d 165 · 1987
Citation profile
26 federal appellate · 7 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 85 later decisions — most recently April 2010 · most notably Thomas v. Sullivan (1991), Nelson v. Sullivan (1992)
26 federal appellate · 7 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 416 (§ 216 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Consolidated Edison Co of New York v. National Labor Relations Board · Polaski v. Heckler · Brand v. Secretary of Department of Health Education and Welfare · Valente v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 85 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“numerous examinations and hospital visits”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“review[ing] the administrative record as a whole, taking into account evidence which fairly detracts from the ALJ's findings,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“requires the ALJ to give substantial weight to the treating physician's opinion in the evaluation process”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.