United States v. Freeman’s Empirical Analysis
813 F.2d 303 · 1987
Citation profile
23 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently June 2015 · most notably United States v. Sullivan (1990), 113 Wash. 2d 679 - State v. Leach (1989)
23 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 201 (Bank Bribery Amendments) · 18 U.S.C. § 203 · 18 U.S.C. § 371
Relies on Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Local 408, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Board · Johnson v. United States · Tate v. United States · United States v. Pheaster
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““must be sufficient to apprise the accused of the nature of the offense so that he may adequately prepare his defense. Following conviction, the record of the case must be sufficient so as to enable the accused to subsequently avail himself of the form of jeopardy for future prosecution for the same offense.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.