Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 813 F.2d 659 - Mosley v. Cozby

Mosley v. Cozby’s Empirical Analysis

813 F.2d 659 · 1987

Citation profile

363
cited by 363 later decisions
November 2024
most recently cited

70 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 363 later decisions — most recently November 2024 · most notably Yu Zhao v. Gonzales (2005), Mattern v. Eastman Kodak Co. (1997)

70 federal appellate · 1 district ·

155019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Porzig v. Nolden · Harcon Barge Co. v. D & G Boat Rentals, Inc. · Cobb v. Lewis · Thompson v. Betts

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 363 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This Court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction, on its own motion, if necessary.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'The rules ... were not adopted to set traps and pitfalls by way of technicalities for unwary litigants....' ... [T]he notice of appeal requirement may be satisfied by any statement, made either to the district court or to the Court of Appeals, that clearly evinces the party's intent to appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Page v. A
  3. “Motion to Reconsider Order or in the Alternative, Motion for Leave to Take an Interlocutory Appeal In Forma Pauperis.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.