Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 813 F.2d 884 - Linquist v. Bowen

Linquist v. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis

813 F.2d 884 · 1987

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
February 2021
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2021 · most notably United States v. Vig (1999), Olenhouse v. Commodity Credit Corp. (1991)

23 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions

27019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1337 · 28 U.S.C. § 1361 · 42 U.S.C. § 403 (§ 203 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 45 U.S.C. § 231A (Railroad Retirement Act of 1974) · 45 U.S.C. § 355

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Mathews v. Eldridge · United States v. American Trucking Associations · Southeastern Community College v. Davis · Califano v. Yamasaki

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[o]ur objective in interpreting a federal statute is to achieve the intent of Congress.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Porter v. Commissioner · Darling v. Bowen
  2. “exclusive jurisdiction in the courts of appeals over appeals from Board decisions,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Leal v. Ja Szoeke
  3. “clearly articulated purpose ... to encourage retired persons to work”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Carlson v. Bowen

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.