Sehgal v. Lynch’s Empirical Analysis
813 F.3d 1025 · 2016
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 5 U.S.C. § 702 · 5 U.S.C. § 706 · 8 U.S.C. § 1151 (§ 201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1154 (§ 204 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1255 (§ 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Lopez-Mendoza · Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Miranda · Illinois v. Interstate Commerce Commission · Mudric v. Attorney General of the United States · Rajah v. Mukasey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is for agencies to 'produce the statement in question' ... and we are puzzled by USCIS's continued failure to do so.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“We have stressed before that "the better procedure”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.