United States v. Stanbridge’s Empirical Analysis
813 F.3d 1032 · 2016
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district · 8 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Heien v. North Carolina · United States v. Dyer · United States v. Wilson · United States v. Cherry · United States v. Dachman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“and Heien does not support the proposition that a police officer acts in an objectively reasonable manner by misinterpreting an unambiguous statute.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“An officer can gain no Fourth Amendment advantage through a sloppy study of the laws he is duty-bound to enforce.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.