Etienne v. Lynch’s Empirical Analysis
813 F.3d 135 · 2015
Citation profile
11 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1228 (§ 238 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229A (§ 240 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Taylor v. United States · Woodford v. Ngo · Nash v. United States · United States v. Shabani · Moncrieffe v. Holder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A court may review a final order of removal against an alien only if 'the alien has exhausted all administrative remedies available to the alien as of right.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A court may review a final order of removal against an alien only if 'the alien has exhausted all administrative remedies available to the alien as of right.' " Etienne , 813 F.3d at 138 (quoting 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (d)(1) ). "When an alien has an opportunity to raise a claim in administrative proceedings but does not do so, he fails to exhaust his administrative remedies as to that claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ramirez v. Sessions“settled principle of statutory construction that, absent contrary indications, Congress intends to adopt the common law definition of statutory terms,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.