Stem v. Gomez’s Empirical Analysis
813 F.3d 205 · 2016
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“assure[ ] that an officer against whom a complaint is filed understands the allegations against him and receives a meaningful investigation into the accuracy of those allegations,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“pleads factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Texas courts have not resolved important questions about [Chapter 614, Subchap-ter B].”). 49 . See FKM P’ship, Ltd. v. Bd. of Regents of the Univ. of Horn. Sys., 255 S.W.3d 619, 633 (Tex. 2008) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.