Hoyt v. Benham’s Empirical Analysis
813 F.3d 349 · 2016
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 28 U.S.C. § 2409A
Relies on Pitser v. McCreery · Brown v. Penn Central Corp. · Clark v. CSX Transportation, Inc. · Jane Doe v. J. David Donahue · Heinen v. Northrop Grumman Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to be entitled to such fees [an appellee] would have had to ask for them in a separate motion ... which [it] failed to do.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.