Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 813 F.3d 684 - Stark v. Colvin

Stark v. Colvin’s Empirical Analysis

813 F.3d 684 · 2016

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
August 2020
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Rivera v. Schweiker · Carradine v. Barnhart · Bjornson v. Astrue · Parker v. Astrue · Spiva v. Astrue

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the ALJ's use of language that this court routinely has condemned as 'meaningless boilerplate' and 'backwards' analysis.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “statements concerning the intensity, persistence and limiting effects of these symptoms are not entirely consistent with the medical evidence and other evidence in the record for reasons explained in this decision.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “could reasonably be expected to cause the alleged symptoms,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.