United States v. Allen’s Empirical Analysis
813 F.3d 76 · 2016
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act)
Relies on Payton v. New York · United States v. Mendenhall · Johnson v. United States · Boyd v. United States · California v. Hodari D.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In assessing whether the officers created the exigency, we focus on the 'reasonableness of [their] investigative tactics leading up to the warrantless entry.' ") (citation omitted). Any alleged exigency was one of the officers' making. IV This case is very troubling. But as the Second Circuit observed, "[a]ny problems in effecting the arrest were ... the result of [the officers'] decision to forgo seeking a warrant, and instead go to [the defendant's] home with the pre-formed plan to arrest him without a warrant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“generally does not include conducting a warrantless search”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.