Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 813 F. Supp. 1321 - Magnuson v. Cassarella

813 F. Supp. 1321 - Magnuson v. Cassarella’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently November 2018

3 state decisions

50199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Katz v. United States · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Mincey v. Arizona

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[E]xigent circumstances do not end merely because the victim indicates that she is no longer in danger. That is a determination for the officer to make independently in light of the totality of the circumstances.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]his type of situation has the possibility of an explosive and sudden eruption of violence”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.