813 F. Supp. 2d 214 - Hollie v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
6 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 185 (§ 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act))
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Vaca v. Sipes · DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters · Atkinson v. Sinclair Refining Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“• Ground One: “[W]hether or not defendant Gibson can be sued in his individual capacity for damages is a matter of equity under [District of Columbia law], not within the duty of fair representation.” PL’s Mem. at 5 ¶ 1. • Ground Two: “Defendants claim that Plaintiffs claim is untimely is without merit, as Plaintiffs claim against defendants does not implicate a duty of fair representation and is thus not limited to the [National Labor Relations Act’s] six months filing requirement. ...” Id. ¶ 2. • Ground Three: “Plaintiff did not exhaust internal Union remedies and knew not that he was required to do so.” Id. at 6, ¶ 3. • Ground Four: “The allegations set forth in the Complaint does [sic] not seek to state a viable claim for a breach of the duty of fair representation.” Id. ¶ 4.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“'discovers, or in the exercise of reasonable diligence should discover, the acts that form the basis of [her] claim.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.