In Re Optimal U.S. Litigation’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Pioneer”), an investment advisory firm incorporated in the British Virgin Islands; (2) the”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. In re Optimal U.S. Litigation · 865 F. Supp. 2d 451 - In re Optimal U.S. Litigation

2. “the Santander Plaintiffs’ claims against Santander U.S., Banco Santander, and OIS — all SBT affiliates — are based on those Defendants’ provision, albeit indirectly, of such “investment advisory ... services to SBT.” Thus, section 21L indicates that “the signatories [to the SBT account agreements incorporating the SBT Terms & Conditions] intended the contract to benefit related [Santander] companies” and “gave [the Santander Plaintiffs] reason to know that one of the reasons motivating [SBT] to enter the contract was a desire to confer a pecuniary benefit on related [Santander] companies.” 19”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 813 F. Supp. 2d 383 - In Re Optimal U.S. Litigation

3. “irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of The Commonwealth of The Bahamas in any action or proceeding arising out of or relating to the Account or this Agreement, and irrevocably agree that all claims in respect of any action or proceeding may be heard and determined in those courts.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 813 F. Supp. 2d 383 - In Re Optimal U.S. Litigation