Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 813 FSUPP2D 678 - Ground Zero Museum Workshop v. Wilson

Ground Zero Museum Workshop v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
February 2021
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 9 district · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 17 U.S.C. § 102 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 17 U.S.C. § 106 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 17 U.S.C. § 1201 (§ 103 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act) · 17 U.S.C. § 301 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 17 U.S.C. § 512 (§ 202 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1030 (Computer Fraud and Abuse Act) · 26 U.S.C. § 512

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Erie Co v. Tompkins · Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co. · Scott v. Harris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When choosing the applicable state substantive law while exercising diversity or supplemental jurisdiction, a federal district court applies the choice of law rules of the forum state.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “despite [the defendant's] failure to reassert the counterclaims when answering Plaintiffs' first and second amended complaints, [the defendant] ha[d] otherwise manifested his intent to pursue the counterclaims throughout the case history.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “not failed to prosecute [his counterclaims] or otherwise waived his right to pursue them.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.