Chism v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 2005
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on International Ass'n of Machinists v. Duckworth · Cox v. State · Bolin v. Wingert · WOERNER, ETC. v. City of Indianapolis · Elmer Buchta Trucking, Inc. v. Stanley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) is limited in capability to the recording or transmitting of information regarding an offender's presence or absence from the offender's home; (2) is minimally intrusive upon the privacy of the offender or other persons residing in the offender's home; and (8) with the written consent of the offender and with the written consent of other persons residing in the home at the time an order for home detention is entered, may record or transmit: (A) visual images; (B) oral or wire communication or any auditory sound; or (C) information regarding the offender's activities while inside the offender's home.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Chism v. State“'monitoring device' in the offender's home or on the offender's person, or both.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Chism v. State“a working telephone in the offender's home”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Chism v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.