Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 813 NW2D 102 - State v. Boldman

State v. Boldman’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Bernhardt v. State · State v. Palmer · State v. Leake · State v. Andersen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “carefully examine the record to determine whether the facts and the legitimate inferences drawn from them would permit the [factfinder] to reasonably conclude that the defendant was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the offense of which he was convicted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The verdict will not be overturned if the fact-finder, upon application of the presumption of innocence and the State's burden of proving an offense beyond a reasonable doubt, could reasonably have found the defendant guilty of the charged offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, and it must be assumed that the fact-finder disbelieved any evidence that conflicted with the verdict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.