Stadler v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 2011
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co. · McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co. · Hicks Ex Rel. Feiock v. Feiock · Samuel Gompers v. Buck's Stove & Range Company · Guin v. Ha
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“was not conditioned on any further action by Continental, it was imposed solely for past actions and could not be avoided by any subsequent action on Continental's part”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[AJny sanction which is imposed as a result of the civil contempt proceeding must afford a continuous opportunity to the defendant to purge the contempt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Douglas v. State“the contemnor could have purged the contempt at any time, thereby reducing the amount of restitution he or she would eventually have to pay”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.