Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 813 P.2d 526 - Langley v. State

Langley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bruner v. State · Jones v. State · Pisano v. State · Mornes v. State · Davis v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] cautionary instruction is not necessary if the following conditions are met: (1) If there was a good opportunity for positive identification; (2) if the witness is positive in his identification; (3) if the identification is not weakened by prior failure to identify; and (4) if the witness remains positive as to the identification, even after cross-examination.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.