813 So. 2d 10 - Huffman v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
34
cited by 34 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited
33 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Coker v. Georgia · 403 So. 2d 943 - Buford v. State · 451 So. 2d 469 - Rusaw v. State · 623 So. 2d 537 - Turner v. Singletary · Huffman v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus the petitioner must have a clear legal right to the requested relief, the respondent must have an indisputable legal duty to perform the requested action, and the petitioner must have no other adequate remedy available.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“even if a felony is classified in the Florida Statutes as a capital offense, it is not `capital' under case law unless it is subject to the death penalty.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“defendants convicted of crimes that may be classified as capital in the Florida Statutes, but who were not actually sentenced to death.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.