813 So. 2d 1123 - State v. Jordan’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
55
cited by 55 later decisions
2
states following
August 2017
most recently cited
55 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Barker v. Wingo · Manson v. Brathwaite · State v. Dorthey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The opportunity to crossexamine a witness about his in-court identification of the defendant as the perpetrator of a crime will ordinarily cure any suggestiveness of such an identification.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re RWS“Even if the identification procedure is suggestive, an identification will be permissible if there is not a very substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re RWS“the in-court identification of defendant was permissible because there did not exist a substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re RWS
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.