State v. Paulk’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited
17 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 414 So. 2d 509 - Williams v. State · 712 So. 2d 374 - Pease v. State · 753 So. 2d 605 - State v. Barnes · 724 So. 2d 1216 - State v. Turro · State v. Alvarez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An issue is preserved for appeal if the attorney's articulated concern is sufficiently specific to inform the court of the alleged error.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Perdomo · State v. Shaw“we reverse the downward departure sentence and remand with instructions to allow the defendant to either withdraw his plea and proceed to trial or be re-sentenced pursuant to the guidelines. Our ruling is without prejudice to the trial court to revisit the issue of downward departure on a more fully developed record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Bryant“[t]he State does not have to advise the trial court specifically that the reason for the departure is invalid”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Naylor
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.