813 So. 2d 22 - Jones v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
17 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 531 So. 2d 161 - Poore v. State · 681 So. 2d 1136 - King v. State · 516 So. 2d 249 - PALM HARBOR SP. FIRE CONTROL D. v. Kelly · 756 So. 2d 90 - MW v. Davis · 685 So. 2d 1210 - State v. Dugan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“and place the defendant on drug offender probation”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Roper · State v. Crews“develop and administer a drug offender probation program which emphasizes a combination of treatment and intensive community supervision approaches and which includes provision for supervision of offenders in accordance with a specific treatment plan. The program may include the use of graduated sanctions consistent with the conditions imposed by the court. Drug offender probation status shall include surveillance and random drug testing, and may include those measures normally associated with community control, except that specific treatment conditions and other treatment approaches necessary to monitor this population may be ordered.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“treatment and intensive surveillance, rather than incarceration, is available to defendants who qualify [for drug offender probation] based on the nonviolent nature of the crime . . . and their status as chronic substance abusers.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.