813 So. 2d 652 - State v. Patin’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Taunt v. General Retirement System of Detroit · Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Maryland · 779 So. 2d 735 - State Ex Rel. Olivieri v. State · 601 So. 2d 649 - State Ex Rel. Mims v. Butler · State, in Interest of Dl
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“pursuant to Article 895, the trial court had the discretion to relieve defendant of the specific probation condition that he comply with the sex offender registration and notification requirements. Accordingly, the State's argument lacks merit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Patin“two statutes deal with the same subject matter, they should be harmonized if possible. But if there is a conflict, the statute specifically directed to the matter at issue must prevail as an exception to the statute more general in character.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Patin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.